Recent Gallup and West Health findings show that healthcare cost security weakened in 2025, pushing affordability concerns into sharper focus for households, employers, health plans, and policymakers. For patients, the issue is not only whether coverage exists on paper. It is whether a family can schedule care, fill prescriptions, and pay bills without cutting into basic needs. That distinction matters because insurance coverage and financial protection do not always move together.
The healthcare cost security measure divides adults into categories based on whether they can afford quality care, including recent visits and prescriptions. In 2025, only 49% of U.S. adults were classified as “Cost Secure,” down from 56% in 2021 and the lowest level since West Health and Gallup began measuring the index in 2021, according to Gallup’s 2025 findings. Gallup also reported that about 2.8 million Americans fell out of the Cost Secure category between 2024 and 2025.
The other categories help explain why this finding is financially significant. In 2025, 41% of adults were considered “Cost Insecure,” meaning they lacked access to affordable care or had recently been unable to pay for care or medicine. Another 10% were classified as “Cost Desperate,” meaning they reported both an inability to pay and problems accessing needed services. These categories should not be read as clinical measures. They are affordability indicators, and they point to the strain that medical prices, prescription costs, deductibles, and billing practices can place on household budgets.
The survey results do not prove a single cause. Inflation, plan design, provider prices, prescription costs, coverage gaps, and regional access differences can all affect what patients experience. Still, the direction of the measure from 2021 through 2025 suggests that the affordability problem had broadened rather than narrowed.
Age differences in the Gallup data deserve close attention because they challenge a simple assumption that older adults are always the least financially protected. Adults ages 18 to 29 had the steepest decline in Cost Secure status, falling from 46% in 2021 to 32% in 2025. Adults ages 65 and older also saw a decline, from 73% in 2021 to 61% in 2025.
Those age patterns may reflect different pressures. Younger adults are more likely to face unstable employment, plan switching, student debt, or gaps between coverage options. Older adults may have Medicare coverage, but premiums, supplemental coverage, prescription drug expenses, dental care, vision care, and long-term care needs can still create real costs. The poll does not establish which factor drove each age group’s change, so the safest interpretation is that affordability pressure has reached multiple stages of life.
The decline in healthcare cost security was not evenly distributed. In 2025, 38% of Black adults and 32% of Hispanic adults were classified as Cost Secure, compared with 55% of White adults. Since 2021, the decline was 16 percentage points for Black adults and 19 percentage points for Hispanic adults, compared with 3 percentage points for White adults.
These differences are especially important for billing transparency and access policy. If a patient is more exposed to surprise costs, narrow networks, transportation barriers, or limited appointment availability, a posted premium does not capture the full burden. Affordability analysis should therefore examine more than monthly insurance costs. It should include deductibles, coinsurance, prescription tiers, network adequacy, unpaid medical bills, and the likelihood that a patient delays care because of cost.
Healthcare affordability became a day-to-day budgeting issue for many households in 2025. About one-third of Americans reported cutting back on food, utilities, or other daily expenses to cover healthcare costs, according to a Reuters report carried by Investing.com. That finding matters because medical bills do not sit apart from rent, groceries, childcare, transportation, or debt payments.
For a finance-minded view of healthcare access, this is the central concern: out-of-pocket exposure can shift risk from insurers and employers onto patients. A plan may appear affordable if the premium is low, but a high deductible or high coinsurance rate can leave a patient vulnerable once care is needed. Prescription drug costs can create similar pressure when formularies change, when a medication falls into a higher tier, or when a patient’s share is based on a percentage of the drug price.
Gallup also reported rising worry about future healthcare expenses. In 2025, 51% of Americans said they were worried about paying for healthcare services in the year ahead, up from 44% in 2024. Concern about paying for prescription drugs rose to 42% from 36%. Worry is not the same as an unpaid bill, but it can influence behavior. Patients who expect unaffordable charges may delay visits, skip follow-up conversations, or avoid asking about options. Those choices can have health and financial consequences, so they should be discussed with qualified professionals rather than handled through guesswork.

The 2025 findings point to a practical affordability agenda: make costs easier to understand before care is delivered. Price estimates, clear explanations of deductibles, accurate provider directories, and plain-language prescription coverage information can help patients compare options. These tools do not make care inexpensive by themselves, and estimates can change if clinical circumstances change. Still, clearer billing information may reduce avoidable surprises.
Employers and health plans can also study whether benefit designs are creating barriers for lower-income workers and families. For example, a deductible that is manageable for a high-income household may be unaffordable for a worker living paycheck to paycheck. That does not mean every plan has a simple fix. It does mean affordability should be tested against real household cash flow, not only actuarial averages.
Public programs, nonprofit clinics, local assistance offices, and community health organizations may also help patients understand coverage choices or connect with eligible support. Readers interested in exploring community-oriented health access resources can review the comprehensive information available at CPCWA. For related context on how affordability signals are being tracked, see the analysis of recent healthcare affordability index signals.
These steps are administrative, not medical. They do not replace clinical judgment, and they should not be used to delay urgent care. Their value is in helping patients see financial exposure earlier, when there may be more room to ask questions.
Healthcare cost security is best understood as a practical measure of whether the healthcare system is financially usable for ordinary households. The 2025 Gallup findings showed that fewer adults felt protected from healthcare costs than at any point in the measure’s five-year history. The sharp declines among younger adults, Black adults, and Hispanic adults suggest that affordability policy should be assessed through an equity lens as well as a budget lens.
For patients and families, the safest next step is not to avoid care, self-adjust treatment, or rely on online claims about cheaper substitutes. Instead, discuss cost concerns directly with a clinician, pharmacist, insurer, or billing office. Useful questions may include whether a clinically appropriate generic is available, whether a covered alternative exists, whether a prior authorization is needed, whether a payment plan is offered, or whether financial assistance screening is available. Those conversations can help connect medical decisions with household affordability without replacing professional medical advice.
